The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The May 2007 consultation document (see link above) stated that nuclear power accounted for around 18% of electricity, based on the latest energy statistics available at that time. The most recent published data now available, in the Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/energy/statistics/publications/dukes/page39771.html, shows that in 2006 nuclear power accounted for 19% of the electricity generated in the UK.
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
On the inside cover of The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
Most of the responses submitted to the consultation can be found on line at www.direct.gov.uk/nuclearpower2007, except where those submitting information have asked for it not to be made publicly available. This website also includes reports on regional stakeholder meetings and the deliberative events held during the consultation
R.E.H. Sims, et al, 2007: Energy supply. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz et al], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA http://www.mnp.nl/ipcc/pages_media/AR4-chapters.html
The May 2007 consultation document (The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf) stated that nuclear power accounted for around 18% of electricity, based on the latest energy statistics available at that time. The most recent published data now available, in the Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2007, shows that in 2006 nuclear power accounted for 19% of the electricity generated in the UK. http://www.berr.gov.uk/energy/statistics/publications/dukes/page39771.html
No web link provided.
The Sustainable Development Commission identified a 5-12.6% saving in annual carbon emissions from nuclear power, depending on whether gas or coal power stations were used instead of nuclear (Sustainable Development Commission, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon Economy, Paper 2: Reducing CO2 emissions – Nuclear and the Alternatives, March 2006 http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/Nuclear-paper2-reducingCO2emissions.pdf)
This is based on the assumption, as outlined in the Nuclear Power Generation Cost Benefit Analysis http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39525.pdf, that the alternative generation that would be built instead of new nuclear power would be gas-fired power stations.
The Government’s estimates from the cost benefit analysis and the corresponding private sector estimates are set out on pages 66 – 70 and in Figure 4.2 on page 67 of the nuclear consultation document The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
This implements the special international regime set out in the Paris Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy of 29 July 1960 and the Brussels Supplementary Convention of 31 January 1963, regulating liability for personal injury and third party liability property damage caused by incidents involving nuclear matter in the course of carriage to or from, or on a licensed site. For further details refer to http://www.nea.fr/html/law/nlparis_conv.html and http://www.nea.fr/html/law/nlbrussels.html
See paragraphs 4.12-4.15 and 4.32 of The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf. Articles 48 and 53 of the Euratom Basic Safety Directive, have now been implemented in the UK.
Table 4.4, page 73, The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
Further details can be found in Renewable Energy: Reform of the Renewables Obligation, URN 07/636, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39497.pdf, published with the Energy White Paper
Professor B. A. Bridges, Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE), 10th Report , The incidence of childhood cancer around nuclear installations in Great Britain http://www.comare.org.uk/documents/COMARE10thReport.pdf and Professor A. Elliott, Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE), 11th Report, The distribution of childhood leukaemia and other childhood cancers in Great Britain 1969 – 1993 http://www.comare.org.uk/press_releases/documents/COMARE11thReport.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf, p 110, paragraph 6.44 – 6.47
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, Table 6.2, p 114 http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
Partitioning and transmutation is a proposed method to separate out individual radionuclides in long-lived radioactive wastes (with half-lives of thousands of years) and to convert them into short-life wastes (with half-lives of tens or hundreds of years). The technique is primarily an area for research and has not been proven to be viable on an industrial scale (see CoRWM Report, Partitioning and Transmutation, August 2004, http://www.corwm.org.uk/PDF/631%20-%20PT1.pdf)
No web link provided.
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The concept of voluntarism, and how it might relate to a volunteer community, was addressed in the Managing Radioactive Waste Safely consultation (Managing Radioactive Waste Safely, A Framework for Implementing Geological Disposal, 25 June 2007 http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/radwaste-framework/consultation.pdf) which ran between 25 June and 2 November 2007
No web link provided.
Managing our Radioactive Waste Safely (CoRWM Document 700), CoRWM’s Recommendations to Government, July 2006 http://www.corwm.org.uk/content-1092
Managing our Radioactive Waste Safely (CoRWM Document 700), CoRWM’s Recommendations to Government, July 2006 http://www.corwm.org.uk/content-1092. Full text of recommendation is “Within the present state of knowledge geological disposal is the best available approach for the long-term management of all the material categorised as waste in the CoRWM inventory when compared with the risks associated with other methods of management. The aim should be to progress to disposal as soon as practicable, consistent with developing and maintaining public and stakeholder confidence.”
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
Managing our Radioactive Waste Safely (CoRWM Document 700), CoRWM’s Recommendations to Government, July 2006 http://www.corwm.org.uk/content-1092
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
Managing our Radioactive Waste Safely (CoRWM Document 700), CoRWM’s Recommendations to Government, July 2006 http://www.corwm.org.uk/content-1092
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
Managing our Radioactive Waste Safely (CoRWM Document 700), CoRWM’s Recommendations to Government, July 2006 http://www.corwm.org.uk/content-1092
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
Chapter 5, The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
Low-grade ore is defined by some authors as ore containing a maximum of 0.01% U3O8, for example, M. Diesendorf & P. Christoff, CO2 Emissions from the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, November 2006 http://www.energyscience.org.au/FS02%20CO2%20Emissions.pdf
High-grade ore is defined by some authors as ore containing a minimum of 0.1% U3O8, for example,M. Diesendorf & P. Christoff, CO2 Emissions from the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, November 2006 http://www.energyscience.org.au/FS02%20CO2%20Emissions.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy, Consultation Document, URN 07/970, May 2007 http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39197.pdf
See reports by the Nuclear Industry Association at http://www.niauk.org/position-papers.html and IBM Business Consulting Services, An Evaluation of the Capability and Capacity of the UK and Global Supply Chains to Support a New Nuclear Build Programme in the UK, IBM UK Ltd, Basingstoke, 2005
The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) is an US initiative for an international partnership to enable the expanded use of nuclear energy by using technology to produce non-proliferation benefits, make more effective use of fuel resources through recycling and reduce waste volumes. Further information can be obtained from http://www.gnep.energy.gov
2The Future of Nuclear Power, Consultations on the proposed processes for Justification and Strategic Siting Assessment, URN 07/972, May 2007 http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39199.pdf
The Future of Nuclear Power, Consultations on the proposed processes for Justification and Strategic Siting Assessment, URN 07/972, May 2007 http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39199.pdf
The Nuclear Power Generation Cost Benefit Analysis (http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39525.pdf) assumed that the alternative type of generation that would be displaced by new nuclear power would be gas-fired plants.
We recognise that concerns were raised in the responses to the consultation about safety risks related to accidents or the threat of terrorist attacks. Some argued that these types of risks made nuclear power fundamentally different from other types of energy. The models we used in our analysis did not attempt to monetise all costs and benefits, for example a monetary value associated with potential accidents was not estimated. Evidence suggests that the likelihood of such accidents is negligible, particularly in the UK context. Though accident risk should not be dismissed, the assumption is that this can be managed through design of regulatory and corporate governance arrangements for the nuclear industry. This assumption is similar to the position of the Sustainable Development Commission, see The role of nuclear power in a low carbon economy, SDC position paper, March 2006 http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/SDC-NuclearPosition-2006.pdf. See Nuclear Cost Benefit Analysis (available at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39525.pdf) for more details.
No web link provided.
No web link provided.
A study of the potential for tidal power in the UK carried out by the Sustainable Development Commission (www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/tidal.html) suggests that around 90% of the UK's (practical) tidal range resource exists within the Severn Estuary and that a Severn Barrage could provide up to 5% of our electricity demand. Opposition to such a project would therefore limit considerably the potential capacity from tidal resources in the UK.
The Future of Nuclear Power, Consultations on the proposed processes for Justification and Strategic Siting Assessment, URN 07/972, May 2007 http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39199.pdf
Appendix A to The Future of Nuclear Power, Consultations on the proposed processes for Justification and Strategic Siting Assessment, URN 07/972, May 2007 http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39199.pdf